Caitlin Clark, like 99.99 % of People this summer season, is not going to be a part of the 2024 US girls’s Olympic basketball group. Formally, the group might be introduced on Sunday, however in keeping with experiences and Clark herself, she didn’t make the 12-woman roster.
In contrast to the remainder of us watching, nevertheless, Clark possesses world-class taking pictures vary, gorgeous passing imaginative and prescient, and a record-setting scoring potential. These attributes have made her the No. 1 choose on this yr’s WNBA draft and the most-watched girls’s basketball participant on the planet. Her video games have set viewership and ticket gross sales information.
With all of the expertise, hype, and a focus, Clark staying residence this summer season is a shock to many. Hundreds of thousands of individuals have been instructed that Clark is arguably the very best girls’s participant on the earth and inarguably its largest star, and now she will not be a 2024 Olympian. Some critics are even saying that is the worst basketball choice the US has ever made.
Clark herself congratulated the Olympic squad, mentioned it’s probably the most troublesome group to make, and that she hopes to be in Los Angeles in 2028. “I am excited for the ladies which are on the group,” Clark mentioned this weekend after an Indiana Fever observe. “I used to be a child that grew up watching the Olympics. It will be enjoyable to observe them.”
In contrast to roster alternatives previously, Clark not making the minimize has triggered an inflammatory response, with some calling into query the integrity of the girls who made it as an alternative of her and even the integrity of the US. These excessive reactions stem from a harmful and more and more in style subtext about Caitlin Clark’s greatness, one which paints Clark as a transcendent star and her friends as terminally jealous people. The wild gist: Clark must be shielded from her fellow gamers.
It’s change into clear that these Caitlin Clark followers aren’t all that all in favour of girls’s basketball and even Clark herself however, quite, look like deeply invested in pulling the brilliant younger basketball star right into a tradition conflict that she doesn’t appear all that all in favour of being part of.
Caitlin Clark’s Olympic omission is riling up poisonous followers
Over the previous couple of years, the rise of Caitlin Clark has been one of many largest tales in sports activities. Clark’s sport — prolific scoring, deep taking pictures vary, full-court passes — is thrilling to observe. Sports activities media has even created the time period “the Caitlin Clark impact” to confer with the ticket gross sales and hundreds of thousands in TV viewership that Clark is accountable for. All over the place Clark performs, whether or not it’s the College of Iowa, her alma mater, or the Indiana Fever, her present WNBA group, folks wish to see her sport.
For ladies’s basketball, a sport that’s been neglected and overshadowed by its male counterpart, the eye paid to Clark has been an achievement. Her video games draw the type of viewership that the NBA does, and similar goes for identify recognition. I’d wager that extra folks would be capable to identify Caitlin Clark than final yr’s NBA rookie of the yr (Victor Wembanyama).
Whereas that focus has raised girls’s basketball’s profile, it’s additionally dropped at gentle some extraordinarily bizarre, unsavory conduct from her followers and the media.
Final yr, within the 2023 Nationwide Championship, Angel Reese was the topic of a nationwide dialog about her conduct after she taunted Clark within the last minutes — one thing Clark had achieved to her opponents all through her match run. As an alternative of being seen as enjoyable or assured (as Clark’s antics had been portrayed by media and basketball followers) Reese’s chaff was dubbed “classless” or, as Keith Olbermann, a former ESPN anchor tweeted, “a fucking fool.” Because the pile-on grew and Reese discovered herself in the course of a nationwide dialog about her character, Clark went to bat for her, reminding the fan base: “I get to play this sport and have emotion and put on it on my sleeves, and so does everybody else … I don’t suppose Angel needs to be criticized in any respect.”
Clark is getting at just a few issues right here. For one, there’s the double customary of how she was handled by followers versus how her Black friends are handled, but additionally the deeply associated concept that she warrants some type of added benevolence that different gamers don’t. As Clark has moved to the WNBA, this narrative that Clark wants safety has solely grown.
Clark’s fellow WNBA gamers are being portrayed within the media as petty and jealous of her accomplishments. Aliyah Boston, Clark’s teammate and reigning WNBA rookie of the yr, has restricted her social media after receiving hate from followers on-line for underperforming. Earlier this month, Chicago Sky participant Chennedy Carter fouled Clark with a shoulder verify that the WNBA later upgraded to a extra critical foul. Clark mentioned that the foul was within the warmth of the second and that there’s no want for an apology.
Nonetheless, the foul spurred an editorial from the Chicago Tribune and a WNBA inquiry from a sitting member of Congress. Extra alarming is that Carter and her Sky teammates mentioned they have been stalked and harassed by a person outdoors a group lodge in Washington, DC, and wanted safety to deal with the scenario. Clearly, not all of Clark’s followers are of the stalker selection, but it surely’s not precisely a shock that somebody would harass the Sky group so long as outstanding folks preserve pushing the false narrative that Clark wants safety from jealous gamers — even when Clark herself has quashed that concept a number of instances.
Clark’s prominence and the dialog surrounding her have just lately caught the eye of right-wing personalities, like former Republican presidential hopeful Nikki Haley. Haley tweeted about Clark’s Olympic omission, implying that the ladies on the US group weren’t the very best US gamers and that Clark had been shortchanged: “I feel the Olympic choice committee needs to be requested: Do we wish the very best group to signify our nation or not?”
The notion that the US isn’t pretty much as good because it was once and the folks representing the US — the group is predominantly Black and contains LGBTQ gamers — aren’t its finest aligns with political messages that Haley used on the marketing campaign path to attraction to voters. It appears Haley is extra all in favour of positioning Clark’s basketball profession as a tradition conflict and fascinating her base than she is invested in Clark as a participant. Six months in the past, throughout a marketing campaign cease that doubled as a Hawkeyes tailgate in Coralville, Iowa, Haley referred to Clark as Kaitlan Collins, who is definitely a CNN anchor.
Opposite to Haley’s opinion, Clark thinks the Olympic group is America’s finest. “It’s probably the most aggressive group on the earth … I’m going to be rooting for them to win gold,” Clark mentioned in a huddle with reporters on June 9.
The argument for Caitlin making the Olympic group
The plain query surrounding Clark’s omission from the group is whether or not or not she was adequate to make it. However that doesn’t include a transparent reply, primarily as a result of the factors for making Crew USA has lengthy been subjective and typically relentlessly opaque.
The choice committee has, lately, made some head-scratching selections.
Again in 2016, Candace Parker — a future Corridor-of-Famer and one of many sport’s biggest gamers — was left off the group. Parker, who was 30 in 2016, was one the very best gamers on the earth and helped the US win gold in 2008 and 2012. She has mentioned that she thinks UConn’s Geno Auriemma, who was teaching the nationwide group on the time, didn’t need her on the group. Breanna Stewart, a latest graduate who Auriemma had coached at UConn, was the one participant beneath the age of 25 taken.
Then in 2021 (the Olympics have been delayed due to the pandemic), Nneka Ogwumike was left off. Ogwumike, a perennial all-star and MVP (like Parker), was additionally 30 on the time. Daybreak Staley, the present coach at South Carolina and nationwide coach on the time, cited uncertainty over a knee harm as the explanation Ogwumike was not chosen.
The teachings from these previous two Olympic snubs is that it’s fairly clear that Crew USA isn’t the 12 “finest” gamers and that there’s priority for taking a youthful participant over a confirmed participant of their prime. Crew USA may even err on the aspect of warning relating to accidents.
These arguments might need labored in Clark’s favor. She’s younger (like Stewart was in 2016) and is popping in rookie season. Clark is averaging 16.8 factors per sport, 5.3 rebounds per sport, and 6.3 assists per sport within the WNBA. She ranks fourth relating to the league’s leaders in assists per sport and performs level guard, a place that the US isn’t terribly deep in — Angel Reese and Cameron Brink, Clark’s fellow rookies, are additionally having good seasons however play front-court positions the place the US is loaded. Brink made the 3×3 Olympic basketball group.
Chelsea Grey, a 2020 Olympic gold medalist and level guard for the Las Vegas Aces, is on the 2024 group. She hasn’t performed within the WNBA this yr after a foot harm saved her out of the WNBA finals final yr. Grey and Clark play the identical place. Additional, Diana Taurasi — a five-time girls’s basketball gold medalist — may even be going to Paris regardless of averaging fewer factors, rebounds, and assists than Clark this season.
The issue is, whilst you might make an argument that Grey and Taurasi ought to have been left off rather than Clark, there are additionally a few gamers — 2020 Olympic gold medalist Skylar Diggins Smith and WNBA scoring extraordinaire Arike Ogunbowale — who’re having higher seasons than Clark on this second who additionally aren’t going. Clark’s sport, whereas good, is marred by her 5.6 turnovers per sport and lack of toughness on protection.
Maybe probably the most fascinating argument in all of that is that this whole kerfuffle is over a minuscule quantity of minutes on the tip of the bench.
Whether or not or not it’s Taurasi, Grey, or Clark, the backup level guard will doubtless be the final spot referred to as to play. That theoretical lack of minutes was really an element, in keeping with two nameless USA Basketball sources who spoke to USA Right now. They instructed the paper that the “concern over how Clark’s hundreds of thousands of followers would react to what would doubtless be restricted taking part in time on a stacked roster was an element within the choice making.”
If that reporting is to be believed, then there’s some merciless symmetry that Clark’s followers — particularly the poisonous ones — could have been a part of the choice course of in conserving her off the roster. Leaving Clark off the group due to an anticipated backlash to meager minutes looks as if a kind of head-scratching, less-than-transparent causes.
Finally, the one individual instantly affected by Caitlin Clark’s Olympic omission is Clark, and she or he isn’t letting 2024’s disappointment have an effect on her future. “It is a dream. I feel it is just a bit extra motivation,” she instructed reporters this weekend. “You do not forget that. Hopefully, when 4 years comes round, I will be there.”