Boxing’s varied pound-for-pound rankings have turn out to be so convoluted over time that it’s uncommon for followers to utterly agree with them. And that’s precisely the case with BoxRec’s up to date rating, which has confirmed to be universes aside from what the prevailing public opinion about such rankings is. However, they appear to have tousled badly by excluding Oleksandr Usyk from it.
For reference, the Ukrainian heavyweight fast-tracked his method to the highest in Ring Journal’s rankings after defeating beforehand unbeaten Tyson Fury final month in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, which turned out to be the most important combat within the final couple of a long time. Nonetheless, BoxRec appears to have missed the memo or all the combat, as Usyk is invisible on their listing. The result – disastrous!
The place is Oleksandr Usyk in different P4P rankings?
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues beneath this advert
Late yesterday, IFL TV hopped on X to share BoxRec’s listing, which now looks like an enormous mistake! They wrote, “BoxRec’s newest P4P rankings”, and it appeared as follows: Terence Crawford, Naoya Inoue, Dmitry Bivol, Canelo Alvarez, Artur Beterbiev, Junto Nakatani, Shakur Stevenson, David Benavidez, Jaron Ennis, and Subriel Matias.
The sanctioning our bodies, excluding WBC, have all ranked Usyk on the high whereas the Ukranian doesn’t even make the highest ten in WBC’s high heavyweights. Regardless, the Ring Magazines have ranked the 37-year-old on the high of their general pound-for-pound listing. So, when IFL TV requested their followers “Do you agree with these” alongside BoxRec’s listing, let’s simply be good about it and say they didn’t!
Fan manufacturers BoxRec different worldly!
Since Oleksandr Usyk’s win final month, extra importantly, after his efficiency final month, a lot of the boxing neighborhood have unanimously topped the Ukrainian one of the best. So, there was sure to be outrage when BoxRec made this determination. One consumer outright known as the rankings fictional, as he quipped BoxRec should see Usyk as a hoop woman. In fact, there is no such thing as a one higher deserving of being on that listing than Usyk, who’s now undisputed in two divisions with out a single loss!
Take it that is in one other marvel universe the place Usyk is a hoop woman😂
— Skinner (@Sk1nner17) June 11, 2024
The subsequent consumer appeared to have a problem with Shakur Stevenson and Canelo Alvarez’s presence being that top on the listing. Stevenson is coming off an abysmal efficiency, whereas Alvarez has time and time once more refused to combat finest within the division.
My solely drawback with this listing, is Shakur within the precise listing and Canelo that top when he needs to be 9-10
— Bball Lounge 🚀🥊 🇩🇴 (@Ideas2Film) June 12, 2024
One other consumer didn’t agree with Subriel Matias’ presence on the listing, suggesting, in that approach, even Erroll Spence Jr. may make it on the listing. Spence fell from grace after a devastating defeat by the hands of Crawford and hasn’t fought since.
Spence can nonetheless be on there in the event that they’re gonna throw Matias within the combine
— #TMSOM (@slowpxtmsom) June 12, 2024
Another person introduced up Usyk’s stunning absence from the listing, suggesting he deserves the primary spot. Some might say persons are hyped due to recency bias, however the undefeated boxer has fought all of the elites within the sport to get to the place he’s and deserves the highest spot.
How is Usyk not on the listing. He needs to be primary
— Actual Speak (@realtalk100s) June 11, 2024
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues beneath this advert
One consumer refused to imagine the legitimacy of the listing, claiming excluding Usyk even from the highest three is “insane.” Essentially the most prevailing opinion amongst followers is that the highest three needs to be Usyk, Crawford, and Inoue.
Completely not! To not have Usyk in that high 3 is insane!
— Phillip Wilson (@phillywilson32) June 11, 2024
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues beneath this advert
Having stated that, it’s clear as day that folks aren’t keen to face muddied boxing rankings, as evident from the responses. Nonetheless, such rankings are sometimes opinions from the individuals behind the stated organizations, which frequently are usually biased. What do you assume? Do you agree with the rankings?