The largest story in months about media and democracy wasn’t an article—it was the absence of 1. The information broke yesterday afternoon: For the primary time in virtually 50 years, The Washington Submit would not be endorsing a presidential candidate. In actual fact, it could be ending the follow altogether. An endorsement—of Kamala Harris—had been drafted by “editorial web page staffers,” a Submit article reported, however then got here the choice to not publish it. That selection was made not by the paper’s editorial board or newsroom management, the Submit (and others) reported, citing nameless sources, however by its proprietor, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.
Bezos, because it occurs, has billions of {dollars} in contracts earlier than the federal authorities. It didn’t take lengthy for folks to start out suggesting that the choice to not endorse might need had little to do with journalistic precept and far to do with the connection between Bezos and the famously vindictive one who, if elected president of america, might quickly have main affect over his companies. “That is cowardice, a second of darkness that may go away democracy as a casualty,” Martin Baron, a former Submit government editor, informed NPR. “Donald Trump will have fun this as an invite to additional intimidate The Submit’s proprietor, Jeff Bezos (and different media homeowners). Historical past will mark a disturbing chapter of spinelessness at an establishment famed for braveness.” (Bezos has not commented on the endorsement choice. The Submit’s communications chief informed the paper’s reporters, “This was a Washington Submit choice to not endorse.”)
Common folks have few methods of combating forces larger than them, forces akin to the specter of authoritarianism, the boiling-frog encroachment on free expression, and the near-unchecked energy of the ultrarich. However shopper selection is one factor they do have. And within the hours instantly after the non-endorsement was made public, Submit readers pulled the lever they knew to tug, the lever they’ve been pulling roughly so long as newspapers have existed: They canceled their subscriptions. As Max Tani reported in Semafor, counting on accounts from nameless sources, “within the 24 hours ending Friday afternoon, about 2,000 subscribers canceled their subscriptions.” (In the identical piece, Tani quoted a supply saying that the variety of canceled subscriptions was “not statistically important.”) NPR, citing inner Submit correspondence, reported that “greater than 1,600 digital subscriptions had been cancelled lower than 4 hours after the information broke.”
It was an affordable impulse. But when Bezos is, certainly, why the Submit is not endorsing candidates, and if persons are apprehensive about his outsize affect on our society, they shouldn’t be canceling their newspaper subscriptions. They need to be canceling their Amazon Prime subscriptions.
Amazon is the largest retailer on the earth, the second-largest personal employer in america, and the explanation Bezos was wealthy sufficient to purchase the Submit within the first place. And Amazon, as I’ve beforehand reported, is powered by Prime, which in and of itself generates super income for the corporate, along with facilitating ever extra purchasing. Final yr, the corporate’s income from its membership choices alone got here to $40.2 billion. That is roughly twice as a lot because the 2022 income of each publicly traded newspaper firm within the nation mixed, and infinitely greater than that of the Submit, which in Might reported that it had misplaced $77 million prior to now yr, largely on account of declining paid readership. The US has roughly 127 million households. Current estimates present that U.S. shoppers maintain 180 million Prime subscriptions and fewer than 21 million newspaper subscriptions.
Amazon Prime subscriptions pay for Amazon to develop—to gobble up market share, put small shops out of enterprise, and make Bezos extra highly effective. Newspaper subscriptions, by the identical token, pay for newspapers to develop. They pay for reporting and enhancing and fact-checking and the expert labor of a vanishing class of individuals—folks devoted to the cautious work of gathering the information, verifying the accuracy of data, and endeavoring to make sure a well-informed citizenry. The individuals who do this work will not be those liable for killing the Submit’s endorsement. However they’re those who’re more likely to be laid off, furloughed, purchased out, or underpaid if firm income dwindles on account of subscription cancellations.
Subscriptions allow fearlessness and independence; they allowed the Submit to publish the Pentagon Papers and unravel the Watergate scandal, which led to President Richard Nixon’s resignation in 1974. (This was additionally, in fact, when promoting income nonetheless sustained the information enterprise.) Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, who anchored the Watergate protection, launched a press release yesterday calling the choice to not endorse “stunning and disappointing,” particularly given the paper’s “personal overwhelming reportorial proof on the menace Donald Trump poses to democracy.”
Journalism is dear. And the information business is in disaster partially as a result of not sufficient persons are prepared to pay for it. Woodward and Bernstein reported on Watergate for 2 years earlier than Nixon resigned; whereas they did, subscribers helped pay their salaries, in addition to the salaries of the editors and manufacturing workers who labored to convey their tales to the general public. In 2022, Submit reporters gained the Pulitzer Prize for public service, one of many business’s highest honors, for tales in regards to the chaos that befell their metropolis on January 6, 2021, after a bunch of individuals stormed the Capitol and tried to overthrow a legitimately elected president. Subscribers helped pay for that work too. However their numbers maintain dwindling. Because of this, in recent times, some information organizations have come to depend on the largesse of particular person billionaires. The folks whom American journalism establishments had been constructed to serve—common readers—are not paying the test.
Readers who’ve written to cancel their Submit subscriptions have cited the endorsement choice, however they’ve additionally cited the paper’s common decline: “There simply isn’t a lot to learn in The Submit anymore, and it’s not a neighborhood paper in any significant sense,” one wrote. But when these readers need a strong native newspaper, an establishment to maintain holding the highly effective to account, Submit subscriptions aren’t the issue. They’re the answer. The very best factor these readers can do is cancel their $139 annual Prime subscriptions, if they’ve them, and make investments that cash within the journalism they are saying they need and want.